BREAKING: Elon Musk Digs Up Dirt On Fauci Ahead Of Congressional Investigations, Goes Public!

(NRCC News) – Twitter CEO Elon Musk continues to prove that he is one of most important public figures in the battle for freedom of speech and the holding of others in positions of power accountable for their actions, with his sights set now on the infamous Dr. Anthony Fauci, having dug up some serious dirt on him and going public with it on the social media platform. To say the impact was devastating would be an understatement.

Fauci is soon departing his government job, however he isn’t likely to be left alone as members of Congress have warned that he’ll need to testify about his disastrous handling of the pandemic that ended up costing millions of lives.

Everyone already knew Fauci was a sick, twisted narcissist who just could not get enough of having his face plastered on every news network day in and day out during the thick of the pandemic, but what this man has done over the tenure of his career has essentially confirmed he’s a legitimate mad scientist.

Journalist David Hawkins, writing for news publication Slay, said that Musk has repeatedly raised the alarm concerning the rather glaring conflict of interest regarding Fauci that should have been made known long before taking him to task over gain-of-function research. Musk shared some information about Fauci over the course of several tweets that is definitely a major blow to the so-called “doctor.”

“Almost no one seems to realize that the head of bioethics at NIH – the person who is supposed to make sure that Fauci behaves ethically – is his wife. Gain-of-function’ in this context is just another way of saying ‘bioweapon,'” Musk tweeted.

Do you realize the weight of the usage of the term “bioweapon?” That has seriously significant implications for the origin and purpose of the coronavirus that ripped through the world back in 2020 through 2021.

“Some good nuggets in article. Important to note that Fauci authored 2012 paper arguing for gain-of-function research! Obama wisely put this on pause, but Fauci restarted it. Despite these glaring issues, Twitter nonetheless had an internal Slack channel unironically called ‘Fauci Fan Club,’” the tweets read, linking to an article from Yahoo dated May 2021.

The article stated, “The Weekend Australian unearthed a paper Fauci wrote for the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012 in which he argued in support of gain-of-function research. Such research involves making viruses more infectious and/or deadly.”

“Experts have raised the possibility that the COVID-19 pandemic could have originated from a potential lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, where gain-of-function experiments on bat coronaviruses have been conducted,” the article continued.

The piece then noted that, despite the risks of conducting this kind of research, Fauci, writing back in 2012, asserted, “In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?”

“Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?” he asked.

“Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks,” Fauci wrote. “It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.”

“Within the research community, many have expressed concern that important research progress could come to a halt just because of the fear that someone, somewhere, might attempt to replicate these experiments sloppily. This is a valid concern,” Fauci concluded.

In another report for Slay written by Hawkins, he notes that Musk also smashed Fauci by saying “New Twitter policy is to follow the science, which necessarily includes reasoned questioning of the science. Anyone who says that questioning them is questioning science itself cannot be regarded as a scientist.”

Fauci claimed at one point that to question him was to question science. Yes, this man actually possesses an ego that large. In fact, he commented, “That’s what’s called the scientific process. As you get more information, it’s essential that you change your opinion, because you’ve got to be guided by the science and the current data. Attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science. All of the things I have spoken about, consistently, from the very beginning, have been fundamentally based on science. Sometimes those things were inconvenient truths for people.”

Fauci knew all along this kind of experimentation was incredibly risky and dangerous, yet he engaged in it anyway. And then, on top of all that, when things went sideways and the coronavirus got unleashed on the world, he took full advantage of it to further his own career and make a name for himself. That’s absolutely disgusting.

Let’s hope this guy gets held accountable for everything he did that led to the pandemic and the subsequent tyranny that resulted after it hit the masses.

Copyright 2022.


  1. This is s very good article. Thank-you Mr. Musk for pursuing this situation. Yes the coronovirus would have eventually evolved, but nature would have evolved also and the antibodies(in dogs, bats and humans) would have been present without a too early and too rapidly developed vaccine.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here